A business owner at a desk in a bright Arizona office studies website analytics charts on two monitors, with desert mountains visible through the window.
    ← Back to Blog
    Marketing Strategy6 min read

    We Scanned 87 Phoenix Business Websites: Here Is What Is on Them

    October 19, 2026 · Joshua Filani

    We looked at the public homepage code of 87 Phoenix-area dental, med spa, HVAC and plumbing websites. About one in five loads an accessibility overlay widget, 87% have structured data, only 18% have FAQ markup, and just one blocks AI crawlers. Here is what that tells a local business owner about where the easy wins are.

    How we counted

    One request per site to the public homepage, plus robots.txt and llms.txt. No logins, no forms, no names. We read the page source, so anything loaded later by a tag manager is not counted, and the real numbers for tracking tags are higher than ours. We found the sites through ordinary web searches for each trade in Phoenix, then dropped directories, hospitals and franchise corporate pages. 100 sites queued, 87 loaded.

    Want a free audit of your own site?

    Send us your website and we will review your Google, website and lead tracking, then email you what to fix first. No pitch.

    Free. Read-only. We change nothing on your site.

    The numbers at a glance

    ~1 in 5load an accessibility overlay widget (UserWay was the most common)
    18%have FAQ structured data, the format AI answers pull from
    1 of 87blocks AI crawlers in robots.txt
    What we checkedSitesShare
    Any structured data (JSON-LD)76 of 8787%
    Local business type structured data63 of 8772%
    FAQ structured data16 of 8718%
    Google Tag Manager in the page source47 of 8754%
    Google Ads tag in the page source18 of 8721%
    Meta (Facebook) Pixel in the page source14 of 8716%
    Accessibility overlay widgetabout 18 of 87about 21%
    A "skip to content" link for keyboard users36 of 8741%
    Has an llms.txt file34 of 8739%
    Blocks AI crawlers in robots.txt1 of 871%

    One in five pays for an overlay, and it is not protecting them

    We counted a recognizable accessibility overlay on roughly 18 of the 87 sites, with UserWay the most common, then accessiBe and a few smaller vendors. Dental practices were the heaviest users at 6 of 21.

    That matters because the FTC has already ordered accessiBe to pay $1 million over its claim that its tool could make any site WCAG compliant, and UsableNet counted 1,023 sued companies in 2024 that had a widget live on their site. We wrote up the details in Do Accessibility Plugins Stop ADA Website Lawsuits?. The short version: a plugin is a monthly bill, not a fix. If you want to see what a screen reader actually hits on your site, our accessibility audit is free and read-only.

    The same scan found 22% of the 2,966 images we looked at had no alt text or an empty one. Empty alt is correct for pure decoration, so treat that as an upper bound. Even so, 66 of the 87 sites had at least one, and alt text is the single most common thing a screen reader user runs into.

    Tracking tags on health sites: the number is probably higher than ours

    We saw a Meta Pixel in the page source on 14 sites. By trade that was 5 of 23 med spas, 5 of 25 HVAC companies, 3 of 18 plumbers and 1 of 21 dental practices. Tag managers hide many pixels from a source scan, and 54% of these sites run Google Tag Manager, so read our figures as a floor.

    For a med spa or dental practice, that floor is worth caring about. The FTC has fined GoodRx $1.5 million and BetterHelp $7.8 million over health data sent to ad platforms. We explain what actually leaks, and what a clean setup looks like, in Is Your Medical Website Sending Patient Data to Facebook and Google?, and our healthcare tracking audit checks it read-only.

    The AI-search gap is wide open

    Almost nobody is blocking AI crawlers: 1 of 87. That is good news if you want to be cited, since the door is open for everyone, including you. But openness is not the same as being understood.

    • Structured data is common, FAQ markup is not. 87% have some JSON-LD, but only 18% mark up their questions and answers. FAQ markup is one of the cleanest ways to hand an answer engine a question it can quote.
    • llms.txt is on 39%. It is a plain file that tells AI tools what your business does and where your key pages are. It takes an afternoon, and most of your competitors already have one or are about to.
    • Keyboard access is an afterthought. 41% have a skip link, which also correlates with cleaner page structure overall.

    What we would fix first, in order

    1. Add FAQ markup to your top service pages. Use real questions customers ask, answered in two or three plain sentences.
    2. Publish an llms.txt. Name your services, service area, phone and the pages you want quoted.
    3. Replace the overlay with real fixes if you have one: alt text, labels, keyboard focus and contrast.
    4. Audit your tags before you run another ad. Know exactly what your pixels send.

    Want a free audit of your own site?

    Send us your website and we will review your Google, website and lead tracking, then email you what to fix first. No pitch.

    Free. Read-only. We change nothing on your site.

    How the four trades compared

    The averages hide some real differences between trades.

    • Dental (21 sites): the most overlays (6 of 21, 29%) and the fewest Meta Pixels in source (1 of 21). Strong on local business schema at 76%, but only 5 of 21 had an llms.txt.
    • Med spas (23 sites): the highest Meta Pixel share in source (5 of 23, 22%) and the most likely to have an llms.txt (10 of 23, 43%). These are also the sites with the most to lose from sloppy health-data tracking.
    • HVAC (25 sites): 5 of 25 with a Meta Pixel, 5 of 25 with an overlay, and the highest llms.txt rate (12 of 25, 48%), which suggests a few popular website platforms now add that file automatically.
    • Plumbing (18 sites): the lowest overlay rate (2 of 18) and the highest local business schema rate (14 of 18, 78%).

    With samples this small, treat the gaps between trades as hints, not rankings. The overall picture is the part we trust: most local sites do the basics, and almost none do the details that answer engines and screen readers rely on.

    Why this matters for AI answers

    When someone asks an AI tool for "the best plumber in Phoenix" or "how much does an AI receptionist cost," the tool leans on pages it can read cleanly and quote with confidence. Clear structure, real FAQ markup, a plain-language summary at the top and sources that check out all help. A page that hides its answers behind a widget, or never states them at all, is easy to skip. Since almost no one is blocking AI crawlers, the competition is not about access. It is about being the clearest source.

    Check your own site in ten minutes

    1. Look at your page source. Right-click your homepage, choose view source, and search for "fbq" or "connect.facebook.net" to see whether a Meta Pixel loads directly.
    2. Open yoursite.com/robots.txt. Look for any line that says Disallow: / under GPTBot, ClaudeBot or PerplexityBot. If you see one and did not mean to, ask your developer why.
    3. Open yoursite.com/llms.txt. If you get a plain text file, you are covered. If you get a 404, that is a quick win.
    4. Try tabbing through your homepage with the keyboard only. You should be able to reach every link and menu, see where you are, and get to the main content without tabbing through the whole header.
    5. Run your homepage through Google's Rich Results Test. Check for FAQ and local business types.

    Want to see how your own site stacks up?

    We run the same checks on your site for free and email you a plain-English report within 24 hours, with no pitch. Start your free audit, or call (623) 343-3141.

    Sources and method

    Limits: a source scan cannot see tags loaded after the page, and one homepage is not a whole website. The Valley Marketing Group is a marketing agency, not a law firm, and this is not legal advice.

    In our October 2026 scan of 87 Phoenix-area dental, med spa, HVAC and plumbing homepages, about 18 (roughly 21%) loaded a recognizable accessibility overlay widget, most often UserWay. Overlays do not make a site ADA compliant.

    Only 1 of the 87 sites we scanned blocked AI crawlers in robots.txt. About 39% had an llms.txt file and only 18% had FAQ structured data.

    We saw a Meta Pixel in the page source on 5 of 23 med spas and 1 of 21 dental practices, 14 of 87 sites overall. Tags loaded through Google Tag Manager are not visible to a source scan, so the real numbers are likely higher.

    One request per site to the public homepage plus robots.txt and llms.txt, with no logins or forms, and results reported only in aggregate with no site named.
    Tags:original researchPhoenixwebsite auditAI searchaccessibilitytracking

    How Valley Can Help

    We Help Businesses Like Yours Get More Leads — and Close More of Them

    The Valley Marketing Group is a Phoenix-based marketing agency specializing in AI-powered lead generation, paid advertising, and web development for local service businesses.

    • Google Ads & paid search — campaigns built to generate qualified leads, not just clicks
    • AI phone receptionist — never miss a call or lead while you're on the job
    • Website design & development — WordPress, Webflow, Shopify, WooCommerce
    • SEO content & local search — rank for the searches your customers are already making
    Ready to talk now? Get a free 24-hour audit instead
    Want more like this?
    Our monthly newsletter — real marketing tips for service businesses, no fluff. Unsubscribe anytime.
    Free · One email a month · No spam